Rosemary Anderson at B.C. Supreme Court on Mon. Oct. 7, 2019. Photo by Jeremy Hainsworth/Glacier Media
A 42-year-old case of allegations of sexual assault by a Kamloops priest against a grieving woman and the diocese鈥檚 responsibility in the situation is not a case of determining damages but how much those damages will be, BC Supreme Court heard Oct. 7.
鈥淭his is a clear-cut, simple, civil, sexual assault case,鈥� diocese lawyer John Hogg told the court.
Rosemary Anderson alleged in a Dec. 22, 2016, notice of civil claim the sexual abuse at the hands of Father Erlindo 鈥淟indo鈥� Molon, now 86, started when she was 26 when she sought solace after her father鈥檚 death. She names Molon and the Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Kamloops, A Corporation Sole, in the claim.
Anderson was working as a diocese teacher at the time.
Molon now has dementia and has no role in the case. Justice David Crossin heard Molon has denied Anderson鈥檚 claims.
Anderson鈥檚 lawyer Sandra Kovacs told the court Molon, a co-pastor at Our Lady of Perpetual Help in Kamloops, misused his position of power and trust in the alleged assaults in 1976 and 1977.
Molon 鈥渞aped鈥� Anderson 75-100 times, Kovacs said.
And, Kovacs said, Anderson went to then-Kamloops Bishop Adam Exert, late Archbishop of Vancouver, to ask for help.
鈥淏ishop Exner was Father Molon鈥檚 direct superior,鈥� Kovacs said, adding church law required him to investigate the allegations.
鈥淓xner concluded, in his own words, that he 鈥榟ad to do something about鈥� Molon, Kovacs said.
She said rumours about Molon and other women kept coming and that Exner had called him 鈥榩romiscuous鈥� and a 鈥榩layboy.鈥�
However, she said, Molon was allowed to remain but was later removed and left Canada.
Kovacs said Exner鈥檚 interest was preventing a scandal.
Much of the hearing Oct. 7 centered on the admissibility in court of an expert report from Father Thomas Doyle.
鈥淗e says Bishop Exner failed to follow canon law and continued the church approach to covering up sexual abuse,鈥� Kovacs said.
She said the report would give Crossin an insight into the church鈥檚 history of how it has responded to sexual abuse cases through history.
Diocese lawyer John Hogg told Crossin he should not allow Doyle鈥檚 report as evidence.
He said the report is a history of sexual abuse in the Catholic church, and part of Doyle鈥檚 campaign to 鈥榞et鈥� the church.
He said that history was irrelevant to the period of events in Kamloops.
鈥淭he issue is what period is covered by vicarious liability,鈥� Hogg said.
鈥淚t鈥檚 his right to admit liability on the first day of trial,鈥� Kovacs said.
Crossin said the issues are the time frame, liability and 鈥渘ature and extent of the damages.鈥�
Hogg urged Crossin to throw out the expert report, saying Doyle was assuming the judge鈥檚 role in trying the facts and interpreting Exner鈥檚 role
鈥淲e鈥檙e talking about a little old bishop in Kamloops,鈥� he said. 鈥淚f the court wants to read a history of the church, it can do so.鈥�
Crossin heard Anderson had wanted to go to medical school at Dalhousie University in Halifax but could not handle the entrance process due to the self-esteem issues lingering from her alleged treatment by Molon.
Exner is expected to testify next week.
