鶹ýӳ

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

To kill or not to kill? How conservation officers handle problem bears

The B.C. Conservation Officer Service said it follows a provincial policy determined by government wildlife biologists and COS representatives when making its decisions on whether to relocate or euthanize large animals.

The B.C. Conservation Officer Service said it follows a provincial policy determined by government wildlife biologists and COS representatives when making its decisions on whether to relocate or euthanize large animals.

 A bear slowly walks down the road toward the Minnekhada Regional Park entrance. Photo by Stefan Labbé/Tri-City NewsA bear slowly walks down the road toward the Minnekhada Regional Park entrance. The road has been closed to vehicles because of high bear activity. Photo by Stefan Labbé/Tri-City News

Factors that go into figuring out if a bear is a candidate for relocation include no human habituation. That means the animal has not lost its fear when confronted by a human presence, and it hasn’t become used to human generated food sources.

The officers rely on reports showing an on-going history of human habituation and food conditioning to determine if the bear is not a candidate for relocation.

The service said in recent years it has consistently had to euthanize less than .5% of the bears involved in reported conflicts.

“Conservation officers, with the support of its municipal partners, make every attempt to correct the habits of humans, through enforcement or attractant management, before the bear’s behaviour becomes problematic,” said the service in an email to The Tri-City News. “Having to euthanize an animal is the most difficult part of the job for Conservation Officers."