鶹ýӳ

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Federal Court agrees to hear case about public servants' return to office mandate

OTTAWA — The Federal Court has agreed to review the federal government's decision to mandate public servants return to the office three days per week. The mandate, which is set to begin on Sept.
c7e2e5aa07768faf4684ce3588c9f357a8f15f7b5c635d8b247df3ada2cde792
The Peace Tower on Parliament Hill is framed by leaves in Ottawa on August 27, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

OTTAWA — The Federal Court has agreed to review the federal government's decision to mandate public servants return to the office three days per week.

The mandate, which is set to begin on Sept. 9, was made by the federal government in May to the ire of the union tasked with representing the workers.

The Public Service Alliance of Canada took its concerns to the Federal Court, which agreed to hear the case in a decision released Thursday.

“The Federal Court’s decision to hear our case is an important win for federal workers fighting for a fair and transparent approach to telework,” said union president Sharon DeSousa in a statement.

“Remote work is the future of work, and we won’t let the government off the hook for breaking their commitments and ignoring the voices of federal public service workers.”

The union says the hearing will be a "major step" for workers looking for transparency around the decision to return workers to the office.

In a statement, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat highlighted the judge did not endorse the union's argument in the decision, and that "the parties must argue this matter based on a full record.

"This decision means that PSAC’s application for judicial review will proceed to a hearing. This does not affect the decision on increased in-person presence," the statement says.

"Both parties will have an opportunity to present their arguments at a later date. In the interim, we are not in a position to comment further on this case while it is before the Court."

The union brought forward an application for judicial review in late May in an attempt to challenge the mandate.

In July, the Attorney General filed a motion to strike it on the grounds that it be dealt with through the union instead of the courts.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 30, 2024.

Alessia Passafiume, The Canadian Press