COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) 鈥� For the past three decades, South Carolina lawmakers have chipped away at abortion access, requiring ultrasounds, parental consent and 24-hour waiting periods, and banning the procedure early in the pregnancy: first after 20 weeks, then
But now that the has cleared a path , some are taking a step back. Politicians, mostly Republican, are noting what happened this month in Kansas, where nearly 60% of voters that would have allowed the state's conservative Legislature to ban Republican Donald Trump received 56% of the 2020 presidential vote in Kansas. Trump won 55% in South Carolina.
鈥淭he Kansas vote affirms what most of us know," said Sen. Sandy Senn, the only Republican senator to vote against the six-week abortion ban that passed 18 months ago. 鈥淚t鈥檚 the people in my party, most all of them men, yelling the loudest that women should have zero choice from the moment of conception.鈥�
Senn says that while she personally believes 鈥渁ll babies should be born,鈥� she also thinks people should be able to decide for themselves whether to continue a pregnancy during the first few months.
South Carolina lawmakers are also watching other Republican-dominated legislatures. abortion ban Friday after several days of debate, while House and Senate couldn鈥檛 immediately agree on further restrictions.
A total abortion ban with exceptions only if the life of the mother is in danger has just started its way through the South Carolina General Assembly. Committee hearings and floor debates in the House and Senate will have to take place before any bill lands on Republican Gov. Henry McMaster's desk.
Republican legislative leaders agreed to the special session after the U.S. Supreme Court in June. But instead of a rehash of the arguments lawmakers had in , when they passed a ban on abortions after cardiac activity is detected 鈥� at about six weeks 鈥� some Republicans have begun to reevaluate their positions.
鈥淚t鈥檚 like you are playing with live ammunition right now. What you are deciding is going to have immediate effect on a lot of South Carolinians,鈥� said Republican Rep. Tom Davis, who voted for the cardiac-activity abortion ban last year after exceptions were added for pregnancies caused by rape and incest and those that put the pregnant person's life at risk.
Davis said he is now rethinking the whole issue, weighing the rights of a fetus to live against the rights of someone to control their own body.
He says he also will consider the views of people in his well-off coastal district around Hilton Head Island. And he plans to introduce measures to improve prenatal care and give people more emotional and financial support during and after pregnancies.
Rep. Bill Taylor stood just behind McMaster as he signed the into law. Last month he sent an email to his constituents with the all-caps title 鈥淲HAT鈥橲 THE RUSH,鈥� saying South Carolina shouldn鈥檛 hurry to pass a full ban now.
Instead, the state should step back for a few years to see how its new law banning the procedure after six weeks works, the Republican lawmaker said. South Carolina should also examine what happens in states that now have a total ban and others that allow abortions later into pregnancies and study the foster care and other social service programs to see what can be done to help them handle an influx of births, he said. About 6,300 abortions were performed in South Carolina in 2021.
鈥淪o many questions, so few answers, and solutions,鈥� Taylor wrote in the email, which also included the statement: "I treasure God鈥檚 amazing gift of life. I readily accept the label pro-life.鈥�
One reason some abortion opponents don't want to wait to pass a stricter abortion ban is McMaster, who is up for reelection in November. His Democratic opponent, Joe Cunningham, to veto any bill restricting abortion further. Republicans are a few votes short of the two-thirds needed to override vetoes in both the House and Senate.
Abortion opponents have followed a long path to get South Carolina where it is. Lawmakers first rallied in a significant way in the late 1980s, then ramped up their actions even further in the following decades.
In 1990, they requiring the consent of either a parent or judge before a minor could have an abortion. In 1994, they enacted for abortion clinics. And in 1997, they passed a law banning which are rare.
In 2008, a law required mothers to sign a form that they were told they could look before an abortion and in 2010, a 24-hour was passed. A ban on abortion which proponents say is the point that a fetus can feel pain, passed in 2018. Prior to its June ruling, the Supreme Court had never allowed states to ban abortion before the point at roughly 24 weeks when a fetus can survive outside the womb.
Republican Sen. Larry Grooms, who has made ending abortion one of the biggest issues of his 25 years in the Senate, said he wants a full ban because his goal is to 鈥渟ave every life he can鈥� 鈥� but he isn鈥檛 going to demand a certain bill because 鈥渨hen you make it all or nothing, you can end up with nothing.鈥�
鈥淓very pro-life bill we鈥檝e passed over the past 25 years has helped people understand the humanity of the child,鈥� Grooms said.
Democrats in the legislature say it鈥檚 too late for reflection, given the Supreme Court's decision and the fact that the state has already restricted abortion so severely. They fear anything is on the table, including criminalizing women who seek abortions in some way.
鈥淚 think we will land between crazy and insane," Democratic House Minority Leader Todd Rutherford said. 鈥淲here that line is won鈥檛 make any sense. And we shouldn鈥檛 be in this position in the first place.鈥�
___
Follow Jeffrey Collins on Twitter at .
Jeffrey Collins, The Associated Press
