did not know Kieran Culkin was about to drop out of his movie.
It was just a few weeks before shooting was about to begin on and Eisenberg and much of the crew were already in Poland preparing. The film, which opens in theaters Friday, is deeply personal for Eisenberg, who at age 17 started connecting more with his own Polish heritage through his aunt.
The story, rattling in his mind for almost two decades, follows two cousins on a Holocaust tour after the death of their grandmother. Itās about modern pain and historical trauma ā serious themes handled with the light, humorous touch of an odd-couple road trip film. One of them, David, is a little uptight, a little neurotic. The other, Benji, is a little more chaotic. You can guess which one Culkin had agreed to play.
āI connected with the character right away,ā Culkin said. āI knew I wanted to do it. Like, creatively, I wanted to be a part of this thing.ā
But the final season of stretched on longer than anticipated. Suddenly the time with his family heād been counting on was disappearing under the crush of professional obligations and he wanted out. Word of this development came directly to Fruit Tree, the production company run by , Dave McCary and Ali Herting, who decided to keep it to themselves for a beat.
āWe totally understood but we were also panicked,ā said Herting. āHe was meant to fly the next week and start shooting the next day. There wasnāt time to recast. The only ace we had up our sleeves was the fact that Emma had this very close relationship with him.ā
Culkin described Stone's phone call as a āreverse psychology thing.ā Stone, wearing her actor, friend and producer hats, was understanding, honest and direct about the fact that his reasoning made perfect sense and also that the whole thing was going to fall apart without him. But that that wasnāt his problem, she said. Sheād deal with it.
āShe let me off the hook completely,ā Culkin said. āAnd I think it was the moment I got off the phone that I was like āoh (expletive), Iām doing this movie.āā
It wasnāt the first or the last time that the fate of āA Real Painā would hang in the balance. It was a struggle to even secure financing, until Topic Studios came along.
āWe were desperate to be part of it,ā said Ryan Heller, Topic's vice president of film and documentary. āIt had this clear arc for audiences and a huge opportunity to surprise with how deep and layered and complex and personal it was. That combination? Itās a rare thing.ā
There were also the logistical complications of shooting in Poland, which would involve being the first production to film at the , outside of Lublin, and the fact that Culkin was a bit of a live wire on set. The first week was particularly stressful, as everyone found their rhythm working together.
āJesse and our director of photography ( ) had had been meticulously shot listing because they were also so worried about the schedule and they wanted everything to be very precise,ā Herting said. āAnd Kieran didnāt love it.ā
He also found it hard to adjust to taking directorial notes from his scene partner. The result was tension. It was friendly, but palpable.
āIt kind of fit with the movie though,ā Herting said. āLike in the film too, they both soften and kind of started to meet in the middle. And then by the time weāre deeper into the story, theyāve really come together and thereās a sweetness and a bond. Thereās a lot of mutual respect.ā
Eisenberg learned to throw out his playbook and embrace the improvisation. Culkin started to appreciate that his directorās asks were part of a cohesive vision and not arbitrary. The result is something more alive and fun than Eisenberg could have ever planned for. They knew it was special, but now they'd face their next test: Audiences.
The had always been the goal for āA Real Pain,ā and they were rushing to finish the cut just days before it began. But they didnāt know what would happen there: If anyone would like it or buy it. Eisenberg's first film, had a more muted debut in part because the festival was virtual that year.
But with āA Real Pain,ā they neednāt have worried. It was celebrated by audiences and critics and had distributors lining up to chat with Eisenberg moments after its premiere. The sale turned into one of those famous all-night sessions that are rarer and rarer for festival breakouts these days.
āThese are companies that Iāve been pitching to for years,ā Eisenberg said. āIt was totally surreal and even embarrassing a little bit to be in a position like that because I wasnāt ready for it.ā
The next day Eisenberg and Culkin were at lunch. Eisenberg couldnāt even find a moment to eat: He was too busy fielding calls. During one, he looked over at Culkin and flashed a big grin. There was good news coming, he knew. Ever the improvisor, Culkin snapped a shot of his director and co-star in that moment of triumph. Soon the world would know too that Searchlight had acquired it to the tune of $10 million, with a full-fledged theatrical commitment.
The journey of āA Real Painā isnāt over yet. Itās awards season, after all, though Eisenberg winces at the idea that thereās āan element of judgment still to come.ā Itās almost, he added, a Damocles (as in āsword ofā) hanging over the experience.
And yet even he and Culkin have been excited that itās resonating with audiences and not even in the same ways. Benji, it seems, gets a different response everywhere they go. At the Telluride Film Festival, it was āa laugh a minuteā for everything he did. In London, Culkin said, āit was quite the opposite.ā
āThey were not charmed by him,ā Culkin said. āBut they were connected and listening and I thought that was very, very interesting and very cool. Like, no matter what your feeling is on that guy, people are still connecting with it.ā
The litmus test might be in Daniel Oreskesā character Mark, a somewhat minor role that Eisenberg had written specifically for an actor he loves. While the others in the Holocaust tour group are discussing how great Benji is, Mark deadpans: āForgive me if I donāt see this magical spark.ā
āHeās just a lens, but he speaks to half the audience usually every night,ā Eisenberg said. āThe movie is not telling us that this is our hero.ā
Eisenberg had originally written Benji with the idea of playing the part himself. This was an idea he was talked out of. It would simply have been too much on his plate. Heās glad about getting the āeasyā role in David. But one actorās idea of easy is anotherās nightmare. Just ask Culkin whether or not he could play Eisenberg's part.
āThereās just no way,ā Culkin laughed. āI just couldnāt.ā
Lindsey Bahr, The Associated Press