I've been meaning to write something about the increase in security guards at city hall on council days.
If you鈥檝e been there in the last while, the guards鈥� presence is very noticeable, as it was at Tuesday鈥檚 public meeting.
First, some historical perspective鈥�
In my experience, it鈥檚 not unusual to have a guard in the information kiosk on the main floor of city hall. It鈥檚 also not unusual to have one or two in the foyer outside the council chamber, which is on the third floor.
But that鈥檚 about it.
During my visit Tuesday, there were guards posted at both main entrances to city hall 鈥� two at the front doors, one at the back doors.
Inside, there was a guard at the kiosk.
I usually take the stairs up to the third floor, but I鈥檝e learned not to because the door at the top of the stairs is now locked for security reasons.
So I take the elevator.
When I get off the elevator, there is a security guard there, who is monitoring arrivals like me. Depending on your business, you may or may not proceed through another locked door into the third floor foyer.
That鈥檚 where you鈥檒l find another guard standing at a lectern outside the council chamber. That鈥檚 a total of six guards in uniform. Four of them were from Securiguard, two others were city employees.
There may have been others in plainclothes, but I can鈥檛 be certain.
Makeshift coffin
So what do you think 鈥� is this an appropriate number of guards at a public building at a time when the world is a much different place than it was before 9/11?
Or is it excessive in a city where people generally get along and should have access to a building where harm reduction activists once carried a makeshift coffin into the council chamber back in September 2000?
I posed those questions to councillors Adriane Carr, Melissa De Genova and Jean Swanson. I also spoke to longtime harm reduction activist Dean Wilson about the coffin.
Charles Gauthier, the president and CEO of the Downtown 麻豆传媒映画Business Improvement Association, has been a regular visitor to council over the years, so I spoke to him, too.
Finally, I made some Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act requests (which didn鈥檛 reveal much) and received some emailed answers from Greg Conlan, the associate director of the city's protective services, to some questions (which said a bit more).
The budget for security personnel at city hall is just under $700,000 and increased slightly for 2018 鈥� by less than $70,000 鈥� 鈥渄ue to enhanced safety and security practices on council days,鈥� Conlan said in the email.
So to the obvious question: Why an increase in security guards on council days, and what is the rationale for it?
鈥淧rior to the new procedures put in place, there had been increased acts of aggression and disruption which created anxiety for councillors, city staff and the public, and also interfered with the democratic process,鈥� Conlan said.
鈥淪ince the new procedures have been implemented, there have been no significant incidents of concern.鈥�
The city didn鈥檛 elaborate on the 鈥渁cts of aggression and disruption,鈥� but I am aware of an individual who has acted aggressively at city hall long before the increase in security.
Former councillors are aware of this, so is security.
So why the increase now?
Swanson believes the measures may be connected to her visit to city hall back in June 2017.
That鈥檚 when Swanson, who wasn鈥檛 a councillor at the time, and housing activists stormed the council chamber. They held signs that said, 鈥淥ur homes can鈥檛 wait鈥� and chanted the same message.
The mayor and councillors left the chamber, and Swanson ended up in the mayor鈥檚 chair. She led a mock council meeting before all involved left the chamber. No one got hurt.
It was shortly after Swanson鈥檚 time in the mayor鈥檚 chair that more security guards were put in place at city hall. Also, the city now only allows a small number of speakers in the chamber and created an overflow area on the main floor.
鈥淭hat鈥檚 when it started,鈥� said Swanson, who was elected in October 2018.
So what does she think now that she has an official seat in the chamber?
鈥淚t鈥檚 making it seem like the city is not open to everybody, especially because it鈥檚 usually Downtown Eastside residents who get the brunt of the security,鈥� she said, noting she receives texts while sitting in council from people who say they can鈥檛 get past security.
鈥淚 know these people. They鈥檙e not going to hurt anyone. I think it鈥檚 a little bit harsh.鈥�
Added Swanson: 鈥淚 think [security] might get the odd threat against people, and if they know something that I don鈥檛 know, then I guess it鈥檚 legit. But when there are no threats and when it鈥檚 just citizens 鈥� maybe they鈥檙e vociferous citizens 鈥� coming to city hall, I think they should be welcomed.鈥�
Carr was at the meeting in June when Swanson and others stormed the chamber. Carr said she didn鈥檛 feel threatened at that meeting, although she said the act of civil disobedience 鈥渨ent over the line.鈥�
In her three terms as a councillor, despite some of the spirited language from speakers and protests, Carr said she has had no reason to be concerned about her safety.
鈥淔rom my point of view, it鈥檚 excessive,鈥� she said of the security presence.
That said, she added, people throwing stuff from the balcony 鈥� as occurred in February 鈥� shouldn鈥檛 be tolerated. She also has zero tolerance for speakers who disparage city staff.
Carr said she was fine with a smaller complement of security, but recognized other councillors and staff may feel differently than her on the issue of safety.
De Genova had a different take, saying she believes the level of security is appropriate and she trusts city staff鈥檚 move to go in this direction.
鈥淐ertainly 鈥� at least last term 鈥� other council members, including myself, did experience some security challenges and difficulties, and that鈥檚 all I say,鈥� she said.
In a tweet in March, De Genova said that she was 鈥渢ossed out of my council chair by protesters鈥� in 2017. She was pregnant at the time.
De Genova pointed out city hall was in May 2018. Council was forced to hold a brief meeting in the community garden at city hall.
That protest also involved Swanson鈥檚 friends with the Our Homes Can鈥檛 Wait Coalition.
Then-mayor Gregor Robertson and some of the councillors were followed by activists as they left the garden. They followed them down Cambie Street to a city building on Broadway.
Most of council got into the building, but activists blocked the doors to keep Carr and then-councillor Hector Bremner outside.
Activists then walked back up Cambie Street to another city building at 10th and Cambie that serves as a centre for people to obtain permits and licences.
The activists circulated throughout the centre, disrupting meetings between customers and staff, with one protester climbing on top of a desk to demand social housing.
Security cleared the building of staff and customers, which prompted activists to leave. At one point, more than 20 police officers were at the scene at city hall, but no arrests were made.
De Genova said she鈥檚 heard from people who don鈥檛 have a problem with the increased security, and others who do.
鈥淎t this current time, I am comfortable with it,鈥� De Genova said. 鈥淚 understand that it may change and there may be more or less security, depending on the assessments [the corporate security team] make.鈥�
Gauthier said he noticed the increase in security and wondered if it was necessary. But, he added, the recent incidents involving protesters is evidence the security presence is warranted.
鈥淎ll you need is one incident that鈥檚 really severe,鈥� he said, adding that such an incident would then have citizens cast blame on city staff for not being prepared.
鈥淚鈥檓 not overly bothered by [the increase in security]. It鈥檚 a bit of a minor inconvenience for those of us who go there and abide by the rules. They must have their reasons for doing it.鈥�
Gauthier pointed out that when he visits the B.C. Legislature that it鈥檚 like going through security at an airport.
鈥淚 just think it鈥檚 probably the day and age we live in,鈥� he continued. 鈥淚f it was lax, maybe there would be some kind of wingnut that would go there and do something really drastic. I think having a presence is a deterrent in itself.鈥�
As a frequent speaker, he said, he鈥檚 been heckled and had to turn around and tell the person or people to respect his time at the lectern. The politician chairing the meeting often steps in, too, he said.
鈥淢aybe the people who would rather not have security there are probably the ones that are up to doing some kind of performance theatre in council and getting the media attention,鈥� Gauthier said.
Back in September 2000, that鈥檚 what happened when Wilson and members of the 麻豆传媒映画Area Network of Drug Users brought a makeshift coffin into the council chamber.
I鈥檝e seen a photo and it鈥檚 quite something. Check it out 听(Full credit to Elaine Briere and Travis Lupick)
Wilson and the others were there to protest a decision from then-mayor Philip Owen and his council鈥檚 decision to place a 90-day moratorium on spending and services for drug users in the Downtown Eastside.
鈥淚 said, 鈥楲ook it 鈥� all I want is five minutes. I鈥檒l speak for five minutes and then I鈥檒l leave,鈥欌�� Wilson recalled. 鈥淎nd I did exactly what I said. I spoke for five minutes and then grabbed everybody and I said, 鈥楲et鈥檚 go.鈥� We made a deal, and from then on Philip said he knew he could trust me.鈥�
Added Wilson: 鈥淏ecause of how open it was, we were actually respectful of that. If they had pushed back any harder, we would have just gone f***ing crazy.鈥�
Wilson and Owen became allies in the fight for harm reduction services in Vancouver, which eventually led to the opening of the Insite drug injection site in 2003 on East Hastings.
Told about the level of security now at city hall, Wilson said:
鈥淭hat鈥檚 crazy. We used to just walk in, man.鈥�
@Howellings
听
听
