When Brock Boeser stepped into the Canucks lineup as a rookie, he was a breath of fresh air. The Canucks were having tremendous trouble scoring goals prior to his arrival: in the two previous seasons, they set new franchise lows for fewest goals.
Boeser single-handedly changed that, reinvigorating the power play and seemingly scoring at will with his wicked wrist shot. He scored 29 goals in just 62 games in his rookie year, a 38-goal pace over 82 games.
In fact, Boeser was for goals and points and surely would have done so if not for when he was hit into an open bench door. He fell just five goals and five points short of both records, and Elias Pettersson went on to break Bure's rookie points record the following season.
Perhaps it was because the Canucks hadn鈥檛 had a rookie as exciting as Boeser since the Sedins, but the hype became unbearably high. Boeser鈥檚 stellar rookie season had fans dreaming of a future with one of the NHL鈥檚 elite snipers on the top line, regularly scoring 40 goals 鈥� or more! 鈥� every season.
Pass it to Bulis wasn鈥檛 immune to the hype, : 50 goals in his sophomore season.
It didn鈥檛 happen, but Boeser did manage 26 goals in a season that was once again shortened by injury. He was on-pace for 31 goals over 82 games 鈥� more than respectable, if not quite the heights that fans imagined.
This season, Boeser鈥檚 goals have taken another hit. With 13 goals through 42 games, he鈥檚 on-pace for just 25 over the course of the season. This has some fans concerned about the Canucks鈥� 鈥�.鈥�
Here鈥檚 the thing: Boeser is having a fantastic season. , as has his playmaking and physicality along the boards and on the forecheck. He鈥檚 an integral part of one of the best lines in the NHL with Pettersson and J.T. Miller, and he鈥檚 third on the Canucks in scoring with 39 points in 42 games.
If Boeser were any other 22-year-old forward, fans would be crowing about the progression of his game and his development into a more complete player. But, because of the expectations created by Boeser鈥檚 rookie season, some fans are instead questioning what is wrong with the young winger. Why isn鈥檛 he scoring goals the way he used to?
Perhaps we could find the answer by looking at Boeser鈥檚 shot totals, specifically splitting them up by shot type. Let鈥檚 take a look.
What鈥檚 intriguing is that Boeser is averaging about the same number of shots per game as last season, so it鈥檚 not that he鈥檚 taking fewer shots overall. He鈥檚 also averaging the exact same number of slap shots per game as last season. Other shot types 鈥� backhands, tips, and deflections 鈥� have seen a slight increase, but in such a small sample that it鈥檚 hard to draw any conclusions.
What has changed significantly, however, is Boeser鈥檚 number of wrist shots and snap shots per game. The two shot types have essentially flipped: Boeser is averaging a little more than half a shot less per game when it comes to wrist shots and nearly half a shot more when it comes to snap shots.
One of the key differences between a wrist shot and a snap shot is the time it takes to release the shot. A wrist shot generally has a longer release, while players can get a snap shot off a lot more quickly. Perhaps this means that opposing teams are giving Boeser less time and space to shoot the puck, forcing him to take more snap shots than wrist shots.
That鈥檚 a problem, as the wrist shot has been the source of the vast majority of Boeser鈥檚 goals. Heading into this season, 42 of Boeser鈥檚 59 goals have been scored with a wrist shot: 71%. This season, he鈥檚 scored 6 of his 13 goals with a wrist shot: 46%.
Perhaps the reason Boeser鈥檚 shot looks less dangerous this season is that he hasn鈥檛 been able to really rip a wrist shot the way he has in the past, not because there鈥檚 something wrong with him, but because other teams know that鈥檚 his most dangerous weapon and have worked to shut it down.
One of the places where Boeser was able to find space for his wrist shot in his rookie year was on the power play. He averaged 3.28 goals per hour on the power play in his rookie year. Last year, that dove down to 1.46 goals per hour, as .
This season, Boeser is averaging 1.67 goals per hour on the power play, which is better than last season, but still about half the rate he scored in his rookie year. His shooting percentage hasn鈥檛 rebounded to anywhere near the heights of his rookie year 鈥� in fact, his shooting percentage on the power play is below league average. Let鈥檚 take a look at why is scoring rate and shooting percentage are below that of his rookie year.
In his rookie season, Boeser averaged 35.76 shot attempts per 60 minutes on the power play and 19.03 shots on goal. Last season, that dropped slightly to 32.93 shot attempts and 16.83 shots on goal, but he still led the Canucks in both categories. The power play, even with the addition of Pettersson, was still primarily focused on creating shooting opportunities for Boeser.
This season, that has dropped significantly. Boeser is now averaging 26.17 shot attempts per 60 minutes on the power play, below Elias Pettersson, and 15.5 shots on goal. The power play has started to share the shots around, which has been good for the Canucks as a whole 鈥� they lead the NHL in power play goals 鈥� but means fewer opportunities for Boeser individually.
When the power play has focused on creating shots for Boeser, the focus seems to be primarily to set up one-timers. This is particularly true of their 5-on-3 setup, which has generally featured Boeser and Quinn Hughes trading spots along the blue line and blasting away.
Unfortunately, the slap shot is the least effective of Boeser鈥檚 shots. In his career, Boeser has scored on 7.8% of his slap shots according to NHL.com. The only shot type with a lower shooting percentage for Boeser isn鈥檛 a shot at all: he has scored on 5.3% of his deflections, which are classified as shots that go off a body part, rather than the stick. In other words, Boeser is almost as effective at scoring off accidental deflections off his body as he is scoring with a slap shot.
Let鈥檚 make it a little more stark: Boeser hasn鈥檛 scored a single goal with a slap shot this season.
Boeser is third on the Canucks with 13 goals this season; none of those goals have been scored with a slap shot. According to the NHL鈥檚 official statistics, 23 of Boeser鈥檚 126 shots on goal this season have been slap shots and none of them have gone in the net. If it seems like it鈥檚 been a lot more slap shots than that, it鈥檚 because that total doesn鈥檛 include blocked and missed shots.
Boeser has had more of his shots blocked this season 鈥� 50 of his 213 shot attempts 鈥� than any other Canucks forward. The only Canucks that have had more of their shots blocked this season are Quinn Hughes and Alex Edler, which is understandable, as point shots are less likely to make it through to the net. Unfortunately, we鈥檙e unable to tell how many of Boeser鈥檚 blocked shots were slap shots, as the NHL doesn鈥檛 track shot type for blocked shots.
It just doesn鈥檛 make sense for the Canucks power play to be so focussed on setting up slap shots for Boeser, as it isn鈥檛 his strength. Instead, it should be looking to create space for him to use his most dangerous weapon, his wrist shot.
It makes sense to set up one-timers for Pettersson, who has an 18.9% shooting percentage on slap shots in his career. Clearly, slap shots are a strength of Pettersson鈥檚 shooting game, though Pettersson is an excellent shooter with every type of shot.
The path to getting Boeser more goals seems clear: find ways to get him more time and space with the puck, likely on the power play, to use his wrist shot. Alternatively, the Canucks could just not fret about Boeser at all, as his individual statistics are less important than the success of the team as a whole.
If the Canucks power play is successful without Boeser racking up goals, perhaps there isn鈥檛 a problem at all.
听
