The oddest thing about the 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is that it's named for a U.S. city, despite the fact that you can't buy one south of the border. First seen in 2008 as a concept vehicle, Chevy's new compact crossover is built in Korea and was originally intended for sale across North America. However, GM later decided not to sell it in the States, feeling that there are enough small cars in a portfolio that already includes the new Cruze and Sonic. That's a smart move, since Americans aren't known for their love of compact vehicles. With Kia discontinuing the similarly themed Rondo in the U.S. due to low sales, it's prudent for GM to see how the Orlando fares in other markets, such as ours.
As a compact and economical people mover, the Orlando compares well with established rivals such as the Rondo, Dodge Journey and Mazda5, with one big exception: the number of seatbelts. Whereas the Journey is limited to five passengers and the Mazda5 seats six, the Orlando packs seven seats into its small footprint.
The Orlando's two extra seats come with a lack of leg room and cargo space when the seats are up, but these aren't new problems; much larger SUVs and minivans have the exact same issues. The Orlando's third row is reasonable given the vehicle's size, but you'd still be hardpressed to spend more than 20 minutes in it. It's best to look upon the Orlando as a fiveseater that can handle seven in a pinch-a perspective that turns it into a very sensible choice.
In fact, "sensible" really is the best way to describe this crossover vehicle. It's a downto-earth compact car with the added bonus of two extra seats. Few consumers will be overwhelmed by it, but even fewer will be disappointed by the Orlando's satisfying combination of size, styling, handling, and versatility.
The only remaining question is value, and that's where things can go a bit awry. While the Orlando starts at $19,995-an amazing price for a seven-seater-the base LS model is sparsely equipped. Meanwhile, the top-end LTZ is loaded with features, but becomes much harder to justify at a cost of $28,495. Where the Orlando really shines is in the two LT trims, which offer middle-of-the-road feature sets for roughly $23k.
It's not going to win over the auto enthusiasts amongst us, but for many consumers the goal is to get from Point A to Point B with a minimum of fuss. If you're in the latter group, then the Orlando is a smart choice.
Design-While the production Orlando doesn't look as good as the concept (few cars ever do), the exterior design is still pleasing. The pleasing interior reflects Chevy's continuing improvement across the board, but GM needs to be careful that it doesn't return to its "parts bin" ways of the past. While sharing components is great for reducing costs, the Orlando and Cruze look far too much alike on the inside. The design work is solid, but these cars are deserving of their own personalities. Plastic is obvious throughout the Orlando, as can be expected at this price point, but the materials are pleasant and build quality is above average.
Performance-The Orlando employs the same 2.4L inline-four that powers the Equinox SUV, tuned for 174hp and 171 lb-ft of torque. Unfortunately, while power is sufficient, the inline-four is less powerful and less fuelefficient than in the marginally heavier Equinox. Gone are the days of the five-speed manual, as many automakers have realized that six-speed gearboxes are advantageous in all vehicles-not just sports cars. Most owners will choose the six-speed automatic, but it's nice to have the option. There's some understeer when cornering, but the crossover never feels too big or ponderous, staying true to its compact nature. It handles well in a variety of situations.
You'll feel the bumps and potholes, but the Orlando is reasonably smooth and rarely jarring or uncomfortable. While it's not as spirited as the Mazda5 or as capable an AWD-equipped Journey, the Orlando provides a pleasant and confident on-road experience.
Thumbs up-Compact size; attractive exterior; usable third-row seats; hidden dashboard compartment.
Thumbs down-Uninspired interior; minimalist standard features.
The bottom line-A compact and highly versatile jack of all trades.
